Tag Archives: painting

RetroARTive: Sarah Lucas Rose Bush

Standard

I remember reading a piece about déjà-vu; if memory serves me right, it said that it is a chemical imbalance on the amygdala, the almond-shaped part of the brain that processes emotions and feelings as they are taking place. Apparently, that momentary lapse creates a memory from the present, generating the confusion that comes with remembering the now.
However, as I was standing in the familiar setting of the Situation, part of the Sadie Coles Gallery, I realised that the feeling I was re-experiencing was generated from what is similar but not same. A few months ago, I visited the space for the
Make Love Exhibition, and wrote the RetroARTive piece on it that drew me back to this space the second time. I wanted to see what occupied the space. I was pleasantly surprised.
It turned out that the gallery is in fact dedicated to Lucas‘s work until the end of 2012, and is following an organic flow of evolution that is curated by the artist herself. Historical and new pieces by Lucas and occasionally other artists occupy the space, and transform it into the artistic puzzle that is Lucas’s mind.
The wallpaper was the same but different, with an added layer building up and tearing down the previous image. Two big hooker Boots were in a podium in the middle of the room, lit by a single red bulb. Toilet bowls were carefully placed around the gallery, in the same spot that the concrete blocks and chairs were two months ago, giving the impression of a transformation. Indeed, the creature that was living on the ironing board before now moved to the main room, wrapped around a gun, pointing aimlessly at the wall.
I absolutely loved the main statue of presence and absence, the female shapeless form, breasts made of two light bulbs, and the pelvis, previously a tin now replaced by enamel.
Lucas’s work stayed true to the Make Love spirit, and added a layer on it.
And as I am posting this, I am wondering how the space is now. Only time will tell.

Love,

G

Work, art, or work of art? Mueck at Hauser & Wirth

Standard

I am standing in the middle of a room. On my left, a 2 meter (6 feet) chicken is hanging upside down; on my right, a tiny woman is hugging a bundle of sticks against her naked body. Two women sit in the corner, alternating their gaze from one piece to the other, as if they are following the ball in a game of ping pong.
I am a stone’s throw away from the mecca of London shopping, in one of the most successful Galleries in the world, looking at an exhibition that explores consumption, beauty, femininity and mortality; no, the irony is not lost on me. Add to that the scathing critique from Time Out, and the online debate about art vs craft that the exhibition generated, and the whole space fills up with expectations.

Of course, I would not expect anything less from Hauser & Wirth. Best known for representing over 40 artists and the estates of some powerhouses in the world of art, the H&W galleries are known for taking calculated risks. And I have to say that their latest exhibition with 4 pieces by Ron Mueck is one of them.

In 1997, Ron Mueck‘s Dead Dad caused ripples of shock into the art crowd during Charles Saatchi’s Sensations exhibitions. He presented a miniature version of his dead father’s cadaver, that was both haunting and beautiful at the same time, raising strong emotive reactions from the audiences that came close to it, and the critics that reviewed it. Since then, Mueck went on to exhibit his work in many cities and countries, skipping London every single time; until now.

So, for the first time in over a decade, Mueck’s hyperrealist creations are taking central spot in the capital, inside the Savile Row Gallery rooms.

The exhibition starts with Drift, a small scale sculpture of a modern day middle-aged man that is chilling on a floating mattress, swim suit, glasses and tan on. He is casually extending his arms to his sides, as if he is hoping to touch something, or someone. He is floating alone, and even though his state appears relaxed, he is oozing loneliness.

In the room next door, Still Life is suspended from the ceiling. A man-sized chicken, with bound feet and plucked feathers is hanging upside down. The detail is breathtaking, and even though I knew it was not real, I was reluctant to go really close to it, and surprised it did not smell of dead poultry.

Opposite to it I found my favourite piece of the exhibition. In Woman with Sticks, Mueck explores some of my favourite themes in art and literature: folklore, femininity, beauty, fairytales and gender. A middle-aged naked woman is wielding under the weight of an impossibly large bundle of sticks. The work touches on the expectations and near unrealistic tasks that come along the way for women in legends and real life. What is interesting though is that even though other artists that have explored the subject have often used the typical feminine archetype of the female heroine, Mueck deviates from the norm of beauty as power, and chooses to portray his subject with a realistic attitude. Tired, imperfect skin, overweight, and naked, the sticks digging into her naked flesh as she is trying to hold them together, the goal ending up hurting her. Doing, instead of thinking. It is impossible to look at the piece without feeling something for the woman, without stirring an emotion from within; pity, disgust, aversion, sympathy.

The final piece is Youth, a depiction of a young black boy lifting his blood-stained shirt to inspect a cut on his torso. The piece had been compared to Christian depictions of St Thomas inspecting the wounds of Christ to ensure he was indeed hurt. Mueck uses the same vehicle to portray the invincible self-view of youth, to demonstrate that death is a concept that evolves with age to include the person that is thinking of it. The boy looks puzzled, as if it is registering the wound, but is not registering it on his body. Is he mortal? Are we mortal?

However, Mueck’s work has sparked the classic art dilemma: is it art or is it craft? Is he an artist, or a puppeteer? is there anything artistic in the mixed media that he presents, or is it just the result of flawless technique.

Is it a piece of art, a piece of work, or a work of art?

Well, I am afraid that for me, there is, and shouldn’t be a clear-cut definition. By claiming that something is not art, one implies a knowledge of what is art, making the concept finite, with neat borders that can not be crossed. Painting by numbers and numbers of paint. Different pieces and different artists touch different emotions in different people. I have been in exhibitions where a person is exclaiming ‘how is this art?’ when her friend next to her was moved to tears.

So, in this case I will not make a decision if this is art or not; that is for you to decide. My personal view is that this is a show that if you have the chance to see, then see it. Pop inside, explore the rooms, and see how the work makes you feel. I found it powerful, and a bit sad; i found Woman with Sticks extremely interesting, and very touching; the exhibition had an underlining commentary, that even though it was obvious in its messages, it delivered them loud and clear. Is this art? Only time will tell.

Love,

G

20120523-201936.jpg

20120523-201949.jpg

20120523-202009.jpg

20120523-202018.jpg

Deller & Shringley at the Hayward: from the everyday to the absurd and back.

Standard

I spent the last twenty minutes on the top deck of 139, listening to Kimya Dawson and reading the catalogues of the two exhibitions I have just stepped out of. We were travelling relatively fast through London, a city in a state of surprise at the rays of sunshine that were staining a perfectly gloomy day. The bus was completely empty, and had the combined smell of sunscreen and rubber. I sat on the top deck, catching a glimpse on the screen of myself sitting in the front seat, with my coat on, and my bag on my lap, looking decidedly chirpier than I was this morning.
I found my usual spot in the Oxford Circus Costa, sat down and looked at the people in the next table. A father with greying temples and sparkly eyes was making his young daughter cringe by displaying some serious public affection. She clawed her way out of his hug, and sat on the chair next to him, looking intently at his face. He started moving his hands to what I am sure he thought was the way the cool kids moved these days, and said something along the lines of can I get a hug, yo!. The daughter looked at him mortified, eyes scanning the cafe as she said to him ‘dad, you are so embarrassing’, and then flashing a warm grin and falling in his lap. It is a nice day. I take my iPad and my exhibition catalogues out, take a quick sip from my skinny caramel latte, and here we go:

Getting in the Hayward Gallery definitely looks harder than it really is. Littered with construction work and greeted with a queue that would make anyone gasp, it seems a bit of hard work. Trust me, it is worth it. And I should know, I was in a really foul mood this morning. I spent the day watching reruns of Scrubs, listening to Velvet Underground and drinking apple and ginger tea next to the window, watching the weather being as miserable as I was. I reached for the latest copy of Time Out, and saw that this is the last week for the Deller/ Shringley exhibition. Crap. I wanted to see this for ages. Well, I still had some time, maybe I could do it Thursday, before work, or- No; no; no. I would do it now. After changing music (Yeah Yeah Yeahs) and gulping down my tea, I had a shower, stood in front of my closet for a good 3 minutes, and then I was off.
I had a plan. I would pop in, wonder around the exhibitions for 30 minutes, then their amazing gallery shop for another 30 minutes, and then take the bus to the British Library for a stale scone and a guilty pleasure read. But, when I was greeted at the corner by a massive queue, I knew that the plans would have to change. I initially did my infamous undecided choreography (3 steps forward, stop, think I better leave, turn, 2 steps forward, stop, think I better stay) long enough that the queue had almost doubled since I came. I decided to join in, brave the rain, and see how it goes. If I am not in by the next 15 minutes, I will just go. However, 5 minutes later, I was inside, had my ticket, and was moving in the gallery space. The gallery assistants are not only lovely and helpful, they are also super fast, effectively cutting down the waiting time to the bare minimum. I thanked them, got the programs, and walked in.

Now, the Hayward Gallery is a really special place for me. It has hosted some of the most inspiring exhibitions I have ever seen, and introduced me to amazing talents and their work. It was there that I first saw the patchworks of Tracey Emin, or stood under a chandelier of knickers by Pippilotti. It is a truly amazing space, and I can not recommend it enough. However, I have to admit that I was unsure if their new exhibitions would hold up to the expectations that the precious ones have created.

Well, they definitely did. I first walked in to the Jeremy Deller exhibition, only to be started for a second. You see, the door actually leads inside a room; more specifically, his room, or a recreation of his room, that held the Open Bedroom exhibition 20 years ago. In a time where artists were holding open studio exhibitions, Deller was living with his parents, and that was the only space he could use. Originally seen by no more than 20 people, the space contains the room and the bathroom, with excerpts from Pensees, his artists book, taped on the four yellow walls, like civilised forms of graffiti, actually originating from graffiti found in the Men’s lavatories of the former British Library. The juxtaposition is so intriguing and thought provoking, that it is impossible not to forget that you are in a gallery space and not in someone’s actual bathroom. It is almost as if you are visiting someone’s house, and at a visit to their WC, you can not help but open their medicine cabinet. The whole exhibit has this kind of voyeristic feeling to it, like exploring the space and mind of someone close to you, without their actual consent.
Passing from the uses of Literacy (an open invitation to Manic Street Preachers fans to reinterpret and demonstrate the band’s contribution to art, and intellectual music), Jerusalem, and the impressively constructed Beyond the White Walls, one can find Valerie’s Snack Bar (where you can pop in for a quick cuppa), the amazing Acid Brass (where a traditional Brass Band plays Acid House) with it’s lateral counterpart History of the World (covering an entire wall with a simple but ingenious chart). You can see Exodus, a truly beautiful and strangely hypnotic 3D film that was the climax of his Turner Prize winning film Memory Bucket; American Travels; My Failures (with a number of unrealised projects); and Many Ways to Hurt you – the Life and Times of Andrian Street (the journey of a young man that dreamt of becoming a professional wrestler instead of following in the mining tradition of his town).
However, the two most powerful exhibits are just a wall away. The Battle of Orgreave – an injury to one is an injury to all covers a room with the still raw history of the miner’s strike and the implications it had on the social landscape. There is a timeline (that is impossible to read without getting goosebumps), videos (police training for riots control), and an hour long film (including a restaging of the event with more that 1000 participants) on the confrontation that took place near the Orgreave coking plant in South Yorkshire, something that he had witnessed through his television screen and marked him as a scene of war, instead of a labour dispute. This lead to The Battle of Orgreave, and his ‘The English Civil War Part II’.
The second exhibit that really touched me was the It Is What It Is. That part of the gallery is turned to a discussion forum, with a burned-out corpse of a bombed car in the middle of the room (dubbed ‘the conversation piece from hell’) that brought death and havoc on the 5th of May, 2007 in Central Baghdad. I can not describe the sadness that you feel by looking at what remained from the car, the violence that is carved on every inch of the lifeless object. The forum centres around members of the public and expert witnesses, people from both sides and people from no side. Regardless of the political position, the room holds such a heavy moment that you feel like the air was drained from it. It is quite powerful, and quite poignant.
Deller’s work creates some very powerful emotions, deep and raw, sometimes painful. So it felt slightly strange walking in the Shringley exhibition. As surprised as I was to enter in Deller’s room, I was equally dumbfounded when I was greeted by a headless ostrich. You see, Shringley endeavours to create equally strong reactions to his work; but of a different kind. He is aiming for ‘laughter, intrigued confusion, and disquiet’; and I can assure you, he is getting all three. His work gives birth to more questions than answers: where did the ostrich’s head go? Who is wearing these giant boots? Who deformed this ladder? And why is there a little stick man locked outside in the roof terrace?
His work seems often surreal and paradoxical, with a door painted on a wall, or a ball full of 5 year’s worth of toe nails, or even a headless drummer banging on his drums even after death (as a headless chicken would). His work is full of cheeky winks to other artists, from the hand that tirelessly turns on and off the Light Switch (a reference to Martin Creed‘s Turner Prize winning Work 227: the Lights Go On and Off); to Sleep (referencing Warhol‘s Sleep, one of my favourite experimental films), with an animation of a man experiencing sleep for 8 minutes, instead of the 8 hours.
Shringley is also brushing on the subject of death in many of his pieces, notably on the Gravestone (with a shopping list on it), or the Jack Russell Terrier that is holding a sign exclaiming its death.
It is truly fascinating to see people’s reactions to the pieces. A girl in front of me had tears strolling down her eyes when she was sitting in front of the (admittedly hilarious) drawings room. A man was laughing in increasing bursts in front of a 30 second animation on a loop, his laughter intensifying every time the loop started again. A group of older visitors were standing in front of the Stick Figures having Sex in the Hood of a Car, smiling knowingly when a group of teenagers was wondering if this was art. Two girls (and 3 guys) jumping when they spotted the Dead Rat in the corner of the room.

Shringley evokes strong emotions, but they are the ones that are usually not associated with art. His work is a cross between conceptual, graphic and humorous, and I can genuinely say that it is simultaneously amusing and thought-provocative on so many levels.

However, the exhibitions finish at the end of this week, so if I were you, I would put my shoes on, turn the screen off, and walk, run, or cycle to the Hayward as fast as I could. If however you can not see it, Hayward Press has printed two catalogs that are sold in their online shop that will provide you with all the wonderful strangeness that falls under the Shringley/ Deller exhibitions.

I am off now. But I will see you later,

Love,

G

20120508-212034.jpg

20120508-212042.jpg

20120508-212057.jpg

20120508-212124.jpg

20120508-212151.jpg

20120508-212203.jpg

20120508-212212.jpg

20120508-212220.jpg

20120508-212233.jpg

20120508-212242.jpg

20120508-212307.jpg

20120508-212321.jpg

20120508-212348.jpg

20120508-212407.jpg

20120508-212413.jpg

20120508-212435.jpg

20120508-212446.jpg

20120508-212457.jpg

20120508-212505.jpg

20120508-212511.jpg

20120508-212521.jpg

20120508-212548.jpg

Happiness: the Exhibition

Standard

Champagne translates to celebration; the characteristic sound of the cork popping, the white foam rushing to escape its confinement, the swift arm movement linking the glass and the bottle with a flow of gold.
This would explain why Krug, one of the world’s most renowned Champagne and wine makers, decided to to explore the subject of happiness. In partnership with the Royal Academy, Krug gathered objects from the biggest names in art, from artists and art patrons, to represent and recreate their idea of happiness.
Lady Amanda Harlech, known for her work as creative consultant to Chanel and Fendi, collaborated with Edith Devaney to curate the exhibition in the most magnificent way. Startlingly contrasting pieces lived harmoniously in the same rooms, under the roof of the Haunch of Venison gallery at the Royal Academy.
These objects reflect their idea of happiness, from the materialistic (Krug‘s exclusive Champagne experience) to the idealistic (Vivienne Westwood‘s support material of her campaign to save the rainforest); from the professional (Nick Night‘s section of Studio 4) to the personal (Jemimia Khan‘s children’s riding boots); and from the polished (Manolo Blahnik‘s pair of bright purple and gold stilettos) to the raw (Tyrone Lebon‘s pictures from the Nothing Lasts Forever installation).
The exhibition contained some amazing collector’s items, like an original vinyl copy of the Ziggy Stardust album signed by David Bowie (given by Neil Tennant) and the first lenticular piece of 3D piece of art created by Paul Fryer, as well as Sylvie Guillem‘s signed ballet shoes and a family photo of Bellamy Freud‘s family, taken before her birth.
Other exhibits included a picture by David Bailey, an original dress from the 2009 Erdem collection, a chef jacket worn and signed by Ferguson Henderson, a framed shirt by Marc Quinn, an antique book used by Rupert Sanderson to choose the names of each pair of his shoes, a pencil drawing by Tarka Kings, a photograph by Tom Bell, a family portrait of Tony Blair and his son, shot by Mary McCartney, and a water colour painting by Vivienne Haig.

My two favourite pieces were a painting by Lady Amanda Harlech of a naked man lying in a bath tub, entitled Man in A Bath; and a piece in the entrance, which comprised of a collection of etch-a-sketch games, representing the creative, colourful, and innocently materialistic nature of childhood happiness.

All the pieces were sold in a silent auction, and the proceedings went towards the sport of the Royal Academy Schools.

The exhibition is now over, however it is worth thinking of the relationship between objects and happiness. From the very superficial viewpoint of the item being an object of desire (a Channel bag, or an Hermes scarf) for status, aesthetics, or just possessiveness;all the way to the emotional value of items, like your first diary, or a mix tape you heard on a summer trip, or the cinema tickets from your first date. I do not reject that items can hold happiness within them; I just lean a bit more towards the viewpoint that sees them as representations, or facilitations of happiness.

Either way, I genuinely hope that 2011 was a year that gave you things, memories and experiences that made you happy. An hour away to the end of this year, I would urge all of you to take a few seconds to think of all the things, people, and moments that brightened up your year. I wish you all from the bottom of my heart a magnificent 2012.

Love,

G

20111231-225911.jpg

20111231-225942.jpg

20111231-225949.jpg

20111231-225956.jpg

20111231-230007.jpg